H.R. 3648, The Mortgage Forgiveness Debt Relief Act of 2007

Yesterday - the president offered a Christmas present to many people who have suffered the agony and humiliation of losing their home due to a short sale, foreclosure, deed in lieu of foreclosure or any similar arrangement that relieves the borrower of the obligation to pay some portion of their debt. He approved what passed by the Senate on December 14th - after many months of debate by the Senate..

On December 14th - the Senate passed H.R. 3648, The Mortgage Forgiveness Debt Relief Act of 2007. Initially sent to the Senate on October 4th, the Senate passed this legislation on December 14th.

When debt is forgiven on a home loan, the homeowner must normally count that debt forgiveness as income and pay taxes on it. The bill -- an amendment to H.R. 3648 creates a three-year exception for debt forgiveness on home loans – helping families already unable to meet their mortgages to avoid incurring large tax bills as well.

The bill also extends a provision allowing homeowners to deduct mortgage insurance payments from their taxable income.

In addition to tax relief for debt forgiveness and mortgage insurance payments, the bill includes:

- Tax relief for volunteer firefighters and emergency medical technicians
- Help to expand housing options for college students with children
- Protection of tax relief for homeowners after the death of a spouse
- Flexibility to help co-op tenant/owners deduct real estate taxes and mortgage insurance

The bill is fully offset by increased penalties for failure to file S corporation returns or partnership returns, and new requirements for the payment of corporate estimated taxes.

Comment -- Before - the forgiven debt from a short sale was taxable income, Individuals in already unfortunate situations most likely faced IRS actions because they did not have the money to pay the additional taxes. Even bankruptcy did not get rid of the tax burden. This legislation will relieve that additional burden and may also encourage families to work with their lender to negotiate terms for a short sale (rather than letting their home fall into foreclosure), knowing they will now not be subject to an IRS bill.

Real Estate Brokerages and Their Agents "Steer" People to Their Affliated Entities - and They Are Now Getting Sued For it...

Was the Realtor you used to purchase you home truly acting as a true fiduciary in protecting your home buying and financial interests?

Click on this link to read about one lawsuit about this.

A lender cannot give a kickback to real estate licensees for referring customer and clients - just as licensee's cannot pay an unlicensed person for a referral.

But apparently - there is a loophole in the (lender (in my personal observation noted below) or title company "affiliates" (in the case of the article)) and Real Estate company relationship - whereby - corporate structures or LLC joint ventures can get around that - by funneling money through the corporate ownership structure.

The article goes on to say... "When real-estate brokers or sales associates knowingly steer clients to higher-cost services that benefit the broker financially, they might violate the fiduciary responsibilities owed to those consumers."

The article states: "Real-estate brokerages increasingly rely on income from their affiliates and often seek to maximize their "capture rates" — the percentage of all home-sale transactions that use the affiliates’ services. They also argue that even if the affiliates’ fees or mortgage rates are not the lowest available, the quality and dependability of the affiliates’ services more than compensate for any price differences."

I've usually heard agents tell their buyers - "Hey - use Joe in our office - it will be more convenient for you." Well - that convenience could cost you thousands! Rather than help you "shop" for the best loan when you buy - most agents steer you to a "preferred lender" - perhaps one in their office.

Relocation Advisors Group helps you "shop" lenders. We analyze their Good Faith Estimates for you - so that you can have a lender that has low rates and fees. We have no hidden ties to any of them.

I was at a traditional Realtor meeting a few months ago - and ran into a "Large Lender" person at lunch who stated that Company X (I won't name them for their sake - but they are large) locally – had done a joint venture with them – creating an LLC – where there will be revenue sharing between Company X and "Large Lender" through the LLC -- with the revenue to Company X going up - if their agents pushed their clients to "Large Lender."

I was shocked. Apparently – that must be legal --- as Company X and "Large Lender" wouldn’t do something that is illegal - would they?

Such an arrangement though - to me - does not seem to be in the consumer's best interest. It puts the Company X's financial interests above that of their client 's financial interests. (Perhaps "Large Lender" would be the best loan in some cases - and in others - perhaps not.)

The article that is linked to above - goes on to say... "In the case of a broker-client relationship, fiduciary duty means that a real estate broker is bound to put a client’s best interests ahead of the broker’s and must not profit from the fiduciary relationship unless the client consents."

The relationship I learned about between mega-broker Company X and "Large Lender" does not appear to do that. I would assume that they have some form of disclosure to each client about the Company X and lender LLC profit sharing relationship - but I wonder about the font size..


Rick Hauser, ABR, GRI, Broker-Owner, Relocation Advisors Group Inc.